protests in china over japan

Which is quite an achievement

There was a guy called Dreaming Samurai from Nottingham once.

lord is in the British isles

:trollface:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God

china & north korea vs. south korea, japan, america. would be a good war.

---

Numbers aside, there's no way the n.korea/china side would win unless through attrition. Wars today are not fought with armies, they are fought with technology.

Wouldn't it be great if Mitt Romney won and gave the go ahead for Israel to attack Iran, and the Chinese randomly decide to go to war for no good reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pichubro

Numbers aside, there's no way the n.korea/china side would win unless through attrition. Wars today are not fought with armies, they are fought with technology.

---

What war are you talking about to show this as a war of today? All the "modern" wars I can think of these days are still fought with men and arms, admittedly big arms.

Yes, modern wars have army soldiers, I'm not saying that. I'm saying what good would a 100,000 man army be in asymmetric warfare.

I don't know what asymmetric warfare has anything to do with technological improvements, American had just as hard for a time fighting the Indians as we did the Vietnamese.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pichubro

technology

---

Something China doesn't have (PPFFFF)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GJFfgn3VvJ...inese_Army.jpg

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/image...ry-buildup.jpg

http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/...0111020727.jpg

those are nukes

Oh nationalism, how I have forgotten you still exist in the east

nationalism is cool

Nationalism sucks.

you don't know what your talking about

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hicky

We are the only English people, although you are from the South of England and the North was forcibly made part of England by the South so you are probably THE MOST BRITISH person on PD

---

And I am technically welsh so....

Oh Europe and its attempted meaningless regional differences. When will you learn that regional pride means pretty much nothing, saying your Scottish is like saying in America that your Mid-Atlanticer.

No, you're stupid Kirby. There is a difference between Scottish vs. English than Mid-Altanic vs Pacific.

sometimes when I read certain posts 'BLAH BLAH I'M IGNORANT" sounds instead of the content

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by God

china & north korea vs. south korea, japan, america. would be a good war.

---

I'd pay to see it.

Whatever, break your shit ass island into 4 nations for all I care.

Woah. Anger.

I just think its bullshit that every fucking region on Europe thinks it is hot shit. No they are not. The Scots are fucking Britians, and the Castilians are fucking Spanish.

The Scots are British due to civil warfare and treaties pretty much forcing the countries to come under one ruler. Even if they are British by name, they have traditions and ideals different from the English. King James VI of Scotland at one time held three different titles of King in Scotland, England and Ireland because they were still seperate in the 1600s. It wasn't until 1707 under Queen Anne that had both Scotland and England come under the title of "The Kingdom of Great Britain". Think of it like the original 13 colonies in America. Technically all British colonies, but different in ideals and laws until the federal government gained more power after the Civil War.