Well well, There's more of a response than I expected. Let me pick out a place to start, but first are we talking about micro-evolution which is proven and allows species to adapt (such as darkening skin and hence "races") or macro-evolution which would result in one thing becoming another (ie monkeys to men).
Also, I won't be pulling the 12-year old christian thing that was mentioned by pichubro, because one there's plenty of holes to exploit and also because I'd like this to last for a little while. Let me look through the thread and get started now.
And yes, I know about dog breeding and such. By selectively breeding certain plants or animals, you can get certain traits, however, you cannot breed two seperate species to achieve a new one. Also, if you know anything, continuously repeating this selective breeding process actually weakens and loses genetic information, as represented by the deformed and retarded offspring of certain royal families who refused to marry outside of royalty.
Also, they try to keep it on the down-low, as proven by your apparent lack of knowing, but not one of those "intermediate fossils" has actually been a missing link. I have yet to see an instance where they do not come back and say "Oops, we were wrong".
In that first link it looked like they were trying to indoctrinate anyone who visited the site.
Just for you and the sake of this debate I'll entertain the idea that this isn't a theory, but if you ask, even the most die-hard evolutionist will eventually admit that evolution is a theory, and some will admit it's a flawed one at that.