Palin, because Predator got beaten by some guy covered in mud. That wouldn't happen to Palin, would it?
Hunting is wrong, period
Hunting is great fun, I love to kill animals
Trophy and pleasure hunting is wrong, but it's okay to kill for food
If god didn't want us to eat pigs he shouldn't have made them of ham and bacon
I have no opinion on this matter
Huh?





Palin, because Predator got beaten by some guy covered in mud. That wouldn't happen to Palin, would it?
Palin would wink the Predator to death.
The Pikatwo Diaries ...
Ultimate Destiny: Ninetales 009 Adventures - an original and exciting Pokemon fan fiction, updated whenever-
Palin would think he was a moose and track it down.
Well, they're both pro-life. Palin charges women for rape kits. Predator won't kill pregnant women.
I live. I love. I kill. I catch Pokemons. I am content.





That's because they don't put up a fight, Nido (unless they're Kazumi Kato, of course).
sarah palin as president would almost certainly cause more deaths than one predator running around in the jungle ever could
hell even the fact that she is able to motivate the republican base to elect other republicans to office certainly results in more deaths than a predator
Tough one. Although Cheney I feel would pull it off.
It's one of their code of honor tenets. Predators will generally only kill healthy adults capable of defending themselves. They don't hunt children, the sick, the very old or helpless. Acceptions are made when the situation calls for it but they won't make trophies out of them.
I live. I love. I kill. I catch Pokemons. I am content.
i would say palin.
she would only be a figure head for the cheney-esque elements of the us(like all presidents are but even more so. ronald reagan-level mindless puppet) but would make it even worse by being a public figurehead that "working class people relate to" making it easier to sway their vote. cheney doesnt have the guile or subtlety to pull that off.
And besides, Palin is a women. Women generally do things out of emotion rather than logic. They also try to fix things quickly then realizing that in the long run, it will screw things over. Like instead of pealing and repainting, they would rather paint over things. To clean, they hide it under the bed or in a closet. If it has a stain in it, they would cover it up.
So imagine a presidency where things are "repaired" like that.
Leo 3DS friend Code: 0344 - 9299 - 0936
;]
Leo are you a chick inside? Becuase when I am asked to clean stuff I just shove it all in a closet like most guys.
Leo are you like from a paralell universe? Men are lazy women worry more about the details. Although I do agree with you that women can't see into the future bit.
Oh I don't try to hide it I just want to get it done.
I think the bigger difference is that men tend to cause more messes than women, but they always like to get the job done by themselves. A guy never asks for directions. Because women tend to not mess up as much, they also do not clean up after themselves, instead cleaning up men's mess due to laziness and sexism on the man's part and subservience and possibly denial of their own mess on the woman's part. If there is one thing I have learned from interactions from females, it is that they are never wrong, or at least never like to be told they are wrong or look wrong (hence their dire need to not be embarrased). Therefore women don't like to clean up their own messes simply because they do not acknowledge the mess's existence.





Guys, we're drifting away from the main issue here: is it morally acceptable to hunt women for food?
^ I just realized Editor rhymes with Predator. I'm gonna chew on that for a while.
My dad asked me what "Going Rogue" meant. I told him "Doing what your advisors and publicists tell you to do so it looks like you're thinking for yourself."
I live. I love. I kill. I catch Pokemons. I am content.