# Thread: Kirbx's Formula For Everything

1. ## Kirbx's Formula For Everything

You know in science class I have been watching a show about string theory. String thoery is a piece of garbage but they did bring up a good point in the movie. In out universe the large like then planets and stars is ruled by the laws of General Relitivity while the small things like atoms are rules by Quantem Mechanics. Now obiously you can't have 2 sets of rules for one universe that's aburd. This comes to be a problem with things like back holes which gratitate with General Relitivity but move around each other like Quantem Mechanics.

So I theorize this: if they are 2 of the same rules and are true for the same universe they must be equal.

General Relitivity = Quantem Mechanics

so...

Quantem Mechanics - General Relitivity = 0

Bitches it took me 5 minutes to figure that out and most people spend there whole lifes.

Suck it

2. Well obviously they're not equal if they have different mechanics

3. But they are in the same universe so duh Solly.

4. So you're saying they apply different mechanics in the same universe so they're the same mechanics?

5. Solly has a point

6. Originally Posted by Kirby
You know in science class I have been watching a show about string theory. String thoery is a piece of garbage but they did bring up a good point in the movie. In out universe the large like then planets and stars is ruled by the laws of General Relitivity while the small things like atoms are rules by Quantem Mechanics. Now obiously you can't have 2 sets of rules for one universe that's aburd. This comes to be a problem with things like back holes which gratitate with General Relitivity but move around each other like Quantem Mechanics.

So I theorize this: if they are 2 of the same rules and are true for the same universe they must be equal.

General Relitivity = Quantem Mechanics

so...

Quantem Mechanics - General Relitivity = 0

Bitches it took me 5 minutes to figure that out and most people spend there whole lifes.

Suck it
i want to submit this to a science journal so bad

7. Do it. I am the next Einstein.

8. The questions of life has been finally answered!

9. Well I was thinking over this and maybe you do have a point Kirbx. However, they both have separate ratios of relative movement, hence them having different mechanics. If you could find a formula that could convert both ratios to their differently sized counterparts then maybe you'd be on to something.

10. See told ya.

11. ... Dang. That's AMAZING!

12. No this flawed I know it is I can't let kirbx have this

13. But what you wrote up there has no applicability as far as I can tell.

14. wow

that is the dumbest thing i have ever heard.

0 is a value that represents the idea of nonexistence, so the fact that you even developed an equasion based on 2 different approaches to scientific works cannot be expressed in value anyway. the general idea you presented just means that without 1 science, the other cannot exist. so "0" in the statement isnt actually "0", its the representation of a reality without the conceptual ideas of those two sciences.

so it just means ignorance of concepts of existence.

FIRST POST IN LIKE A MONTH, SUCK IT

15. why do people call you kirbx again

16. 'Cos I called him Kirbx one day.

17. Originally Posted by Pants, and the beast dwelling within
wow

that is the dumbest thing i have ever heard.

0 is a value that represents the idea of nonexistence, so the fact that you even developed an equasion based on 2 different approaches to scientific works cannot be expressed in value anyway. the general idea you presented just means that without 1 science, the other cannot exist. so "0" in the statement isnt actually "0", its the representation of a reality without the conceptual ideas of those two sciences.
x -x = 0. hes just saying they must have the same value, so subtracting one from the other must yield zero.

i cant believe i even made this post.

18. Originally Posted by God
x -x = 0. hes just saying they must have the same value, so subtracting one from the other must yield zero.

i cant believe i even made this post.
THAT

19. the biggest problem in the whole thread is im pretty sure General Relitivity is a theory along with Quantem Mechanics is a theory also? so if these are bith just theories Kirbx post is just invaled in every way possible because they are not yet proven to be true

20. Khaos has a point. Does that mean that the mechanics of relativity would also be included here? They're also part of the same universe.

21. theories dont have values

22. Kirbx once again proved wrong by the power of khaos!!!!!!!!!

23. of course. agreeing with Khaos and Rayne.

24. General Relitivity besides the theory explaining it is a law. Quantem mechanics is a highly regarded theory yet to be disproven. We are talking about the laws and theorys that we used to go to the moon and make an atomic bomb.

25. Originally Posted by Rayne
theories dont have values
.

Page 1 of 2 12 Last

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•