the tag for this thread is great





Do you even know how to read pseudo-legal text? If a 17 year old DID do something with a 14 year old it is STILL illegal just not "rape." No one prosecutes it though but it COULD be prosecuted.Teenagers aged 13, 14 and 15 may or may not be able to legally engage in sexual activity with partners who are less than 4 years older. Such partners could not be prosecuted under statutory rape laws, but may be liable for other offenses, even when the sexual activity is consensual.





Not true. If a 14 year old gets caught giving a bj to a 17 year old by mega religious parents then that 17 year old could get charged. It does happen. The charge is usually corruption of a minor which isn't a fun charge to have because it doesn't go away after you are 18.
The consent age is 16 and that means the child has no legal right to say yes until 16.
In AZ the consent age is 18.
lol mexico
"There has to be evil so that good can prove its purity above it."
- Guatama Buddha
I see no problem with 18...
Though it surprises me how many states are for 16.
Wait...
A sexual problem or just a normal problem?
I'm confuzzled
If someone really wants to have sex something like a consent law isn't going to stop them.
So why force the poor kids to break em?
Just do it.
God forbid they can't have sex. That would be just awful.
/sarcas
All I'm saying is seventeen is a great age to be fucking as long as you're not makin' babies.
Just do it.
As an asexual I guess I don't really understand the appeal.