I find it interesting that people with supposedly high IQs on the internet, usually argue that its useless. Hmmmmm
I wouldn't call it trolling.
Im to stupid to troll, I just make bad jokes and puns at all times.
That's because need to be subtle to troll people kirby
Trolling is a harsh word for it, im picking one side of the debate that noones on and then arguing agianst the other side to my decent ability, because i find enjoyment in arguing with people, because it enhances my skills, and because it helps bring out points on subjects that i may even agree on, that i had never though about before, but yes in that instance i was "trolling"
Me personally, i would keep abortion legal
but people on here like to all argee on everything, meaning there isn't really ever a chance to say, he fuck you guys i disagree, and fully believe in the side i'm arguing over the otherside. If you really look through all the arguments, you will see arise more and more points that aren't given untill us arguing brings us to that point. See what i mean?
Edit: As they say, variety is the spice of life~
Sometimes people on a forum just like to hang out. Crazy, I know...
I remember when I did that back in, like, 2006
? I don't think my arguments are completely wrong either, just because i personally agree more towards the other side that i am arguing against.
Thats why i said i'm like half trolling. I'm not saying my arguments lose any validity by saying what i am saying, just that i personally disagree with what i am typing.
I think you guys do not understand the difference.
And i don't ever remeber losing any arguments, not even this one. I am very lienent with people. People disvalidate part of what i say, while not disvaluing even the main points sometimes, and then i don't push back on the points that are still strong, instead i argue with them on the points they want to pick on out of all of my points that are made.
Because that usually prevents tension and keeps the argument flowing in a more fun direction~
Like i've shown before, i could just bullet point every argument i ever want to make on here and even when i'm not arguing the side i agree with it will make my side alot more appealing and less invalidated by people arguing agianst me, because all of my points would be extremely clear.
LOL I don't think i've ever admitted to anything even close to that, and you thinking so is just a baseless assumption.
NO FUCKING SHIT abortion is mostly a practical issue. And no fucking shit abortion is a basic human right which the government should and cannot(atleast in the U.S.) ethically control.
You think i was so stupid i didn't realise this?
But there are more sides to the issue than just what is the obvious reasons behind why the law is the way it is, or why the law on some things should or shouldn't be changed.
There is the morality of the situations that can arise from these over hauling "ABORTION IS JUST LEGAL, no exceptions"
The same thing also goes for every law, and that is the point i was trying to make through arguing with anyone ever about any kind of criminal law. Situations are not black and white, and every law is flawed in some situations.
polly want a cracker?
which is such a heavy handed set of results it makes them almost useless. like all standardized tests there is too much "noise" to actually draw conclusions on mental capacity from them.
We are a bunch of annoying communists who like to suvk each other off
speak for your self Samson.
JOIN AN RP YOU SLACKERS!