Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 81

Thread: Started Reading the Communist Manifeso

  1. #1
    princeso Kirby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,032

    Default Started Reading the Communist Manifeso

    Very interesting, I had not considered that the Bourgeoisie actually gives the proletariat all the tools it needs to destroy itself. Also I have a greater understanding of how the bourgeoisie was a necessary step from feudalism.

    Also Karl Marx is dead right on conservationism, his words on it are as true as they were when he wrote them, if not more so.

  2. #2
    In reverie, I felt you holding me. Dogar The Brave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    By the shore.
    Posts
    22,923

    Default

    His writings on the dialectic are quite enticing and in my opinion amazing. His "solutions" and hypothesis on the next step in human history not so much.

    Your an absolutely wonderful man, any girl that is yours is lucky and I know that from personal experience. ~KMT

  3. #3
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    I believe for communism to truly work you need to have a capitalism to support it. I believe we should make a country where one part is capitalist, and the other part communist, and the people have the right to choose which they want to be in. Also it should be something close to a rep. demo..
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  4. #4
    Registered Users Regular Rayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    8,566

    Default

    you become progressively dumber with every post you make

  5. #5
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    LOL NICE COUNTER BRO
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  6. #6
    what about .. eyebrows God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    among the people
    Posts
    49,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogar The Brave View Post
    His writings on the dialectic are quite enticing and in my opinion amazing. His "solutions" and hypothesis on the next step in human history not so much.
    it's hard the assess to more "practical" elements of marxism because marx wrote at a time when the economy and society was radically different from how it is now. most notably it was before the bismarkian welfare state. in the context of when he was writing i dont think he was awfully far off. of course the capitalist welfare state changed everything.

  7. #7
    princeso Kirby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,032

    Default

    wyatt a half communist - capitalist system like that I have to admit is pretty silly

  8. #8
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Why? The rich enjoy anything and everything they want(capatlism) however support the poor (government communes) by ensuring everyone who needs/wants a job a job(that pays enough/ gets you enough stuff to support a family). Sounds like a perfect system to me, which would solve most crime/poverty.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  9. #9
    Defenestration is imminent pichubro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Kaleidoscope Of Mathematics
    Posts
    18,276

    Default

    What a wonderful idea. We shall call it socialism.

  10. #10
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    No, that is intermixing the systems within one confind.
    I mean literally having 2 different(the same law wise) societies, but one is capatlist, and the other is a capatalist support commune, all functioning under the same goverment, but abading in two different areas.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  11. #11
    princeso Kirby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,032

    Default

    can Rayne or god explain why that is stupid in short elegant words why that is stupid, I don't feel like arguing with wyatt

  12. #12
    Defenestration is imminent pichubro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Kaleidoscope Of Mathematics
    Posts
    18,276

    Default

    ....

    So...

    combine North and South Korea under one government?

    Wouldn't really work...

  13. #13
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    I'm talking about,like i said to begin with, a rep. demo. Try this with any place that has recources, and is under the peoples controll(not a dictator, not a regime) like canada, U.S., ect.

    There is no reason for it not to work, it has never been tried before. Ever. There are reasons for it to not succeed in geting implemented, but if it were implemented correctly it would 100% work.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  14. #14
    Defenestration is imminent pichubro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Kaleidoscope Of Mathematics
    Posts
    18,276

    Default

    It doesn't work. Why do you think the United States had a civil war -_-

  15. #15
    This pic is definitely of me!! Solly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    retarded
    Posts
    14,000

    Default

    Works in China with rural communes but capitalist urban areas

  16. #16
    This pic is definitely of me!! Solly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    retarded
    Posts
    14,000

    Default

    Or Israel with the kibbutzes in the north and metropolitan societies in the south

  17. #17
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    The singular reason we don't try something like this here is because of the media influence/the rich's power strangle on government and the people. They want to stay rich and not give up as much as they can not have to give up. doing something like this would probably run 10~15% added taxes on the rich and upper middle classes for atleast 5~10 years to get it fully operational, and then past that probably another 5% forever. Thats not something they want to give up to nearly eliminate crime and absolutely eliminate poverty(outside of people who just want to live in poverty(hobos ect.))
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  18. #18
    This pic is definitely of me!! Solly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    retarded
    Posts
    14,000

    Default

    you fucked up elijah

    I vouched for you, and you fucked up

  19. #19
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Thanks for vouching for me, ~.~, but i didn't need/want it. I appreciate it though, really i do. I don't understand how my argument is any less or more valid though.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  20. #20
    Man Of All Things Merry buckweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,689

    Default

    Because it's fucking retarded. A country under the same government and laws where the rich pay for a Communist society is still just plain socialism, even if all the rich Bourgeois live in the same geographic area. The rich are still being heavily taxed to support the poor. It doesn't matter where they live, the system you described is socialism.
    Quote Originally Posted by God View Post
    get out of my way kirby, i've got gulags to build.

  21. #21
    is good for you
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God View Post
    it's hard the assess to more "practical" elements of marxism because marx wrote at a time when the economy and society was radically different from how it is now. most notably it was before the bismarkian welfare state. in the context of when he was writing i dont think he was awfully far off. of course the capitalist welfare state changed everything.
    Explain

  22. #22
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Yes, and whats wrong with socialism? It could easily, easily work without a dicatator in the equation.
    Thats why i've been sure to say REP. DEMO. for the 3rd time. Mixing a rep. demo. with a socialistic society hasn't really been tried. Its always places where theres just a dictator.

    Its also not the same, because in a socialistic society the rich are discouraged from making a bunch of shit, and so are the middle class and upper middle, because they are all under a commune. The value of products deminishes because there is no competition, however in a society that is not all socailised, the majority of people (the people not in poverty) would still enjoy the same level of goods and services, and the people in communes, would be able to not be in poverty anymore, but have to put up with a degraded quailty of goods and services.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  23. #23
    Man Of All Things Merry buckweat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,689

    Default

    Nothing really is WRONG with socialism it's just that you're talking like a crazy motherfucker and acting like you came up with a whole new idea. You're like me in third grade when I told my friend I wrote this song called Feeling This, which was a song I had just heard that day on the radio.
    Quote Originally Posted by God View Post
    get out of my way kirby, i've got gulags to build.

  24. #24
    Registered Users Regular ElijahWyatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Athens, TN
    Posts
    415

    Default

    I'm acting like it's an idea that i came up with, because i did. On my own. With every media outlet saying its the definition of horrible ideas, when its never even been tried, and would totally make society 99% better. And people are saying its a terrible idea, without arguing agianst the actual idea.
    "As for me, all i know is that i know nothing"

  25. #25
    is good for you
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,778

    Default

    Also, Socialism is not Capitalism mixed with Communism, Socialism is the system implemented directly after the "Communist revolution" in which private property is abolished and a more cooperative society is implemented. "Communism" is just the theoretical state of society that will emerge out of Socialism in which the state, as a whole, has been abolished. Y'all talkin' 'bout Democratic Socialism

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •