Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Not being united with is not an equivalence relation

  1. #1
    princeso Kirby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19,006

    Default Not being united with is not an equivalence relation

    the relation of not being united with is both transitive and symmetric, but not reflexive

    this basically means that any number lets say a must be united with its self, it is always the case that aUa, because of this simple trivial statement, not being united with fails to be an equivalence relation

    this is fucking deep, I feel ultra smart for figuring this out

  2. #2
    Registered Users Regular Rayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    8,551

    Default

    what the fuck is united

  3. #3
    Registered Users Regular Flaming Flamingo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    515

    Default

    What the fuck did you just say?

  4. #4
    is good for you
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,767

    Default

    Kirby is saying stuff that makes sense in his head but no one else's

  5. #5
    This pic is definitely of me!! Solly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    retarded
    Posts
    13,969

    Default

    wow so deep

  6. #6
    Defenestration is imminent pichubro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Kaleidoscope Of Mathematics
    Posts
    18,263

    Default

    much knowledge

  7. #7
    *wink* leo33wii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Vilseck, Germany
    Posts
    3,251

    Default

    spam bot
    Leo 3DS friend Code: 0344 - 9299 - 0936

    ;]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •