I think, due to the state of your posting, it's incredibly sad that you're three years older than either me or Kelsh.Originally Posted by Annatar's Munchlax
I think, due to the state of your posting, it's incredibly sad that you're three years older than either me or Kelsh.
It don't matter danmmit!!! Every prophecy regarding the end of the world has been wrong and they will continue to be wrong!!! I know when the earth will end though, it's when you humans least expect it.
It'll be when Bush fires his nukes at Iraq. Probably next year or so.
The president would have to be retarded to do that(although he is an idiot it seems).
Well, if he doesn't fire the nukes, then the next president will have to know the consequences of that particular choice. What I'm saying is that the new president will know not to push the button in The Football, because if he does, the world is screwed.
I think the world's been screwed for a while now.
Well, gas that's less than 10 bucks a gallon will be gone in 20-40 years. So in that time, which is within most of our lifespans, cars are going to be screwed. Well, I'll just have to ride my bike more.
Well then, instead of people standing by the side of the road holding signs that say the end is near they should be running around screamingWe're screwed!
BTW, can I put you on my buddy list, you're pretty cool.
Typhlosion, why the fuck would any President fire a nuclear weapon at a country a large ammount of their soldiers are occupying?
Yeah, when the world's supply of gasoline runs out, cars are obviously all screwed. I suppose you've never heard of alternative power sources like hydrogen fuel cells.
Er, why in hell would Bush fire nuclear weapons at Iraq? The United States controls the region, not to mention the fact that a large portion of their armed forces are there, like Tim mentioned.It'll be when Bush fires his nukes at Iraq. Probably next year or so.
The Pikatwo Diaries ...
Ultimate Destiny: Ninetales 009 Adventures - an original and exciting Pokemon fan fiction, updated whenever-
The peak oil issue is a whole other thread. Lots of experts say no currently feasible fuel source could replace petroleum if the supply declines quickly enough in a short enough span of time, thus industrial civilization will collapse. I think it's too much a paranoid doomsday theory myself.
we will die when jesus comes... brobably in the next thirty seconds
Actually,in Australia you get to drink at 18 so
firing any nuclear warhead could very well start another world war.
and with North Korea building up their supply of nuclear weapons, we are at the risk of being attacked.
“I’m growing impatient with these malevolent slithering reptiles on this bloody aircraft.”
- Snakes on a Plane (As if spoken by a proper Englishman)
You guys seem uninformed, alternative fuel power obviously includes electricity, ethanol, and deisel
Greatness Reincarnated
Deisle is produced from petroleum. I don't know what the point of that post was anyway, who was saying those weren't alternative fuel sources?
That doesn't answer the question of why any President would fire a nuclear weapon at IRAQ. And North Korea is a loooong way away from the technology to actually fire at America.firing any nuclear warhead could very well start another world war.
and with North Korea building up their supply of nuclear weapons, we are at the risk of being attacked.
Electricity is unreasonable, due to the fact that although some models have it today, they drive slowly and need charged frequently.
Ethanol not only costs more than gasoline, but needs it to be made. First, there's the various farm harvesting and transporting machines. Then, there are trucks necessary to transport the corn. The factories themselves use gasoline in the production of ethanol. Then they need the gasoline or diesel in the trucks to get it to the gas stations. Chances are, the people going there went there with regular fuel, not ethanol and are using up more fossil fuels.
Diesel is absolutely dreadful for the environment.
China, India, or Iraq on the other hand...
not a wold war but a nuke war, causing a wipe out of humanity due to radiation poisoning (no we cant block it either, nuclear radiation)
the answer:using and abusin the earths magnetic field in order to stay in the air by thrust
Dumb ass. If there were two countries firing nukes, it could potentially damage their individual continents, but it wouldn't wipe out the world. You would need to have more than two countries firing nukes to destroy the world.
We're not near any type of technology that could build that and keep it at a reasonable price where the profit would be more than the cost of production. Hydrogen fuel cells are the way to go.
The world's energy problems will be solved when nuclear energy is stabalized. It'll happen eventually.
Also it's doubtable any actual country will ever officially fire a nuclear weapon. The only people who would get away with it are America.
He'd pull out the troops first, unless he's an idiot with a death wish.
I beg to differ, but if a nuke went off it'll release a cloud of radioactive dust into the atmosphere that can poison food and water supplies. That's why those idiots flew planes into the world trade center. They knew we had and could use nukes, but they also knew we'd only use them as a last resort.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
