The child can go into care. It happens a lot.
That is the parents choice. They made that choice of their own free will. If my government spends my money on private groups then I have not had that choice, and I object to that.





The child can go into care. It happens a lot.
That is the parents choice. They made that choice of their own free will. If my government spends my money on private groups then I have not had that choice, and I object to that.
Someone who is born poor, will have a primary discourse which is not consistent with what our culture views as the channels to success and self-improvement(education), therefore poverty is a failing of society as a whole, not an individual, in about 99.99% of the cases.Having just consulted both the OED and Wikipedia, I have come to the conclusion that social discourse is concerned with the way in which society communicates ideas, and am therefore at a loss as to what your point is.





Next year I stand to make £12,000, of which at least 20% will will be stolen by the government as income tax.





Clarify.
The Editor, what is the socio-economic condition of your parents/family?





Middle class, I guess. We're no too sure atmCurrently things are running tight due to your country fucking up the economy.





Yes, because tax is the only important thing in the world.
How much do your parents make a year?
The Editor the thing is you have a very sheltered view of the world. Your primary discourse was consistent with education etc growing up. Someone born to an impoverished family will not have that same advantage, so it is a moral obligation for those born with advantages to help those born without advantages so that they can improve themselves, and more people can be born with advantages.





There are other things too, moron. I quite like having an NHS, living in a temperate climate without severe weather conditions and being able to vote Conservative.





That depends on how the year goes.
If it's a moral obligation then why does the government have to make the decision for us? If it were a charity then yes, that would be okay. I'd have a choice. But to take my money and put it into a non-public service without my say so? That isn't right.
Goddamn the Editor you are a stupid sheltered middle class white faggot with a massive sense of entitlement because your parents happened to have money when you were born and are utterly ignorant of the real world.
Yes it is. Let's consider it and price that people pay for being born with advantages that far more people in the world are not born with. Kind of like the price they have to pay for being born without those advantages(poverty, starvation, genocide, social alienation, etc).





What the fuck do you know about my life? True, I may live in a way which is above and beyond other people. But is it above and beyond those people to improve their economic condition? No, it isn't. If I want to maintain my lifestyle I'm going to have to work for it. And if they need the state to support them then they clearly aren't working enough to support their lifestyle, and so should either change their lifestyle or improve their work. That's how a capitalist system works: you get what you give.





Health, transport, education, construction... These are things the government should spend its money on. They are there for everybody. But spending money on individuals is only for their benefit.





Then tell me, how do I live my life?
God The Editor you are such a fucking idiot I'm sorry. You have no concept of the real world you middle class majority faggot.





*sighs* And you have no idea what it's like to have money, right?![]()
Pretty much. My mom is a worthless piece of garbage who has no job and I survive only because of welfare essencially.





Y'know, they're right when they say you should never discuss religion or politics. You always end up here, firmly believing in what you say and convinced your opponent is wrong.